Jordan is Arab-Palestine by YJ Draiman

Jordan is Arab-Palestine

In compliance with the 1920 League of Nations Resolution, two-state solution was implemented in 1922 when British administration of occupied Israel in violation of International Treaties, (for 50 barrels of oil) allocated more than 77% of Israel territory to Arab-Palestinian Arabs and created Transjordan (now Jordan in) where today over 90 percent of the population identify themselves as Arab-Palestinian. Every party, including UN, EU, US, etc., must respect The 1920 San Remo Treaty, the League of Nations Resolutions, adopted and accepted by UN in 1945. Therefore, all so called “Arab-Palestinians” must be relocated there in Jordan. Enough stealing Israel land. Britain and Jordan must compensate Israel for stolen land and natural resources. That includes the assets and land of the million Jews and their children, (that lived in the Arab countries for over 2,000 years), who were expelled from Arab countries of which the majority settled in Greater Israel. (120,444 sq. km. of Jewish Real property was confiscated, which is 5-6 times the size of Israel and valued in the trillions of dollars).
The League of Nation was contemplating on filing charges against Britain for violating the Mandate for Palestine, especially for restricting Jewish immigration prior and during WW2 1939-1947.
History of “Arab-Arab-Palestinians”.
Article 24 of the 1964 PLO Charter addressed to UN stipulates: “Arab-Palestinian Muslims do not exercise authority over West Bank (Judea and Samaria) and Gaza territories”
Arab leaders like Auni Bey Abdul-Hadi told the Peel Commission in 1937: “There is no such country as ‘Palestine’; ‘Palestine’ is a term the Zionists invented!”
In 1946, Arab historian Philip Hitti testified before the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry that “there is no such thing as Palestine in history.”
In 1977, an executive committee member of the PLO Zahir Muhsein confirmed that there is no such thing as a separate “Arab-Palestinian” people of Arab descent. In an interview with the Dutch newspaper Trouw in March 31, 1977, he stated the following: “The Arab-Palestinian people do not exist. The creation of a Arab-Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity.”
In 1948, Bernadotte, mediator between Jews and Arabs appointed by the UN General Assembly, noted in his journal that the “Arab-Palestinian” Arabs had little desire for independence:
“The Arab-Palestinian Arabs had at present no will of their own. Neither have they ever developed any specifically Arab-Palestinian nationalism. The demand for a separate Arab state in Palestine is consequently relatively weak. It would seem as though in existing circumstances most of the Arab-Palestinian Arabs would be quite content to be incorporated in Transjordan.”
In 1947, Arab leaders protesting the UN partition plan argued that Palestine was part of Syria and “politically, the Arabs of Palestine (were) not (an) independent separate … political entity.”
Western media must stop broadcasting and publishing fraudulent, fake, false, and distorted information on Israel and Jews. Current situation, specifically in Europe, is quite similar to 1930s, however, we, Jews, learned our lessons and will not hesitate to give appropriate response to any mortal attacks on us.
YJ Draiman

It is interesting to note, that Jordan is a country that never existed in history before WWI and nobody is contesting its legitimacy or territorial sovereignty and control. The same powers that established 21 Arab States plus Jordan after WWI, established the State of Israel based on the Balfour Declaration and the San Remo Treaty of 1920.
On the other hand, Israel and its Jewish people have over 4,000 years of history.
Many nations and people are questioning Israel’s control of its liberated territory. No one is mentioning that the Arab countries had persecuted and ejected about a million Jewish families and their children from their countries, confiscated their assets, businesses, homes and Real estate 650,00 Jewish people and their children of these expelled Jewish people were resettled in Greater Israel. The Land the Arab countries confiscated from the Jewish people 120,400 sq. km. or 75,000 sq. miles, which is over 5-6 times the size of Israel, and its value today is the trillions of dollars.
Let the 21 Arab countries resettle the Arab Palestinians in the land they confiscated from the Jews which is 4 times the size of Israel. Provide them with funds they confiscated from the million Jewish people they expelled and let them build an economy, This will benefit both the Arab-Palestinians and the hosting countries, The other alternative is relocate the Arab-Palestinians to Jordan, (originally land allocated for the Jewish people) which is already 80% Arab-Palestinians, and give them funds to relocate and build an economy. This will solve the Arab-Palestinians refugee problem once and for all. It will also reduce hostility and strife in the region.
If this is not discrimination against Israel, I do not know what is.
It seems like nobody cares about land violations in other countries in the world, but when it comes to Israel, everyone has a say. Israel’s rights in the terms of the treaty of San Remo of 1920 are in affect in perpetuity. It clearly states that the Jewish people are the only ones with political rights in the British Mandate of Palestine and that the Jewish people can live anywhere in the British Mandate.
If the U.S., Europe and other countries will stop meddling, and stop its criticism and involvement in the politics of Israel and the Arabs, than there will be a chance for peace.
We know the great powers are only interested in the OIL and nothing else, that is the bottom line.
A true and lasting peace in Israel will bring mammoth economic prosperity to The Israelis and The Arabs alike.
An approach to peace starts by teaching the Arab-Palestinian children and the people not to hate and condemn any acts of violence that hurts civilian populations and stop celebrating and rewarding the death and destruction of each other.
http://www.cfr.org/israel/san-remo-resolution/p15248
http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/insideisrael/2010/July/San-Remo-Resolution-Revisited/
YJ Draiman
P.S.
No Jew has the right to yield the rights of the Jewish People in Israel –.
David Ben Gurion.
(David Ben-Gurion was the first Prime Minister of Israel and widely hailed as the State’s main founder).
“No Jew is entitled to give up the right of establishing [i.e. settling] the Jewish Nation in all of the Land of Israel. No Jewish body has such power. Not even all the Jews alive today [i.e. the entire Jewish People] have the power to cede any part of the country or homeland whatsoever. This is a right vouchsafed or reserved for the Jewish Nation throughout all generations. This right cannot be lost or expropriated under any condition or circumstance. Even if at some particular time, there are those who declare that they are relinquishing this right, they have no power nor competence to deprive coming generations of this right. The Jewish nation is neither bound nor governed by such a waiver or renunciation. Our right to the whole of this country is valid, in force and endures forever. And until the Final Redemption has come, we will not budge from this historic right.”.
BEN-GURION’S DECLARATION ON THE EXCLUSIVE AND.
INALIENABLE JEWISH RIGHT TO THE WHOLE OF.
THE LAND OF ISRAEL:
at the Basle Session of the 20th Zionist Congress at Zurich (1937).

Article 51 of the UN Charter, which gives a nation the right to self-defense.
"The attack," Reagan wrote in his memoirs," was not intended to kill Gaddafi; that would have violated our prohibition against assassination. The object was to let him know that we weren't going to accept his terrorism anymore, and that if he did it again he could expect to hear from us again." He cited article 51 of the UN Charter, which gives a nation the right to self-defense. In a television address to the nation Reagan said, "When our citizens are attacked or abused anywhere in the world, on the direct orders of hostile regimes, we will respond so long as I'm in this office."

The self-defense, consent,[2] and Security Council authorization pursuant to Article 42 of the UN Charter.[3] The right to self defense is an inherent concept in law “and is fundamental to the system of states.”[4] It is recognized and protected by Article 51 of the UN Charter:

Article 51

Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security...

The application of the right to combat terrorism was further reinforced by international practice following the 9/11 terror attacks on the United States. Two Security Council resolutions issued pursuant to Chapter VII of the UN Charter[5] reflect this consensus:

Security Council Resolutions 1368 (2001).

Recogniz[es] the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense in accordance with the Charter;...
Expresses its readiness to take all necessary steps to respond to the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001, and to combat all forms of terrorism, in accordance with its responsibilities under the Charter of the United Nations.

Security Council Resolution 1373 (2001).

Reaffirming further that such acts, like any act of international terrorism, constitute a threat to international peace and security,

Reaffirming the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense as recognized by the Charter of the United Nations as reiterated in resolution 1368 (2001),

Reaffirming the need to combat by all means, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts...

The West Bank (Judea and Samaria) was re-taken and liberated from Jordan by Israel in 1967 after another failed Arab attempt at destroying the young Jewish state and has been under Israel control ever since. In the Oslo accords (which are now null and void), Israel tried to give the PA limited supervision on a part of the area but it obviously did not work as the Arab goal here is not the creation of an Arab-Palestinian state but simply the destruction of the Jewish state. That is why they train the Arab children and the masses to commit terror and violence, honor terrorists and suicide bombers.  If they wanted a Arab-Palestinian state, they would have asked Jordan before 1967 for the territories. They never bothered (because they knew it was occupied Jewish territory) until Israel took over.

The Arab countries persecuted and expelled over a million Jews and their families, the Arabs confiscated all their personal assets, including Real estate property 120,440 sq. km. 5-6 times the size of Israel, valued in the trillions of dollars (these Jewish people and their children have lived in those Arab countries for over 2,200 years. Most of those Jews were resettled in the liberated Greater Israel.
Israel must stop all Arab violence at all costs and restore security and safety to its citizens.
YJ Draiman

Ben Gurion
"No Jew has the right to yield the rights of the Jewish People in Israel.
No Jew has the authority to do so.
No Jewish body has the authority to do so.
Not even the entire Jewish People alive today has the right to yield any part of Israel.
It is the right of the Jewish People over the generations, a right that under
no conditions can be cancelled.
Even if Jews during a specific period proclaim they are relinquishing this right, they have neither the power nor the authority to deny it to future generations.
No concession of this type is binding or obligates the Jewish People. Our right to the country - the entire country - exists as an eternal right, and we shall not yield this historic right until its full and complete redemption is realized."


Comments:

Why History Matters: The 1967 Six-Day War

Mention the word "history" and it can trigger a roll of the eyes. 

Add "Middle East" to the equation and folks might start running for the hills, unwilling to get caught up in the seemingly bottomless pit of details and disputes. 

But without an understanding of what happened, it's impossible to grasp where we are — and where we are has profound relevance for the region and the world. 

Forty-eight years ago this week, the Six-Day War broke out. 

While some wars fade into obscurity, this one remains as relevant today as in 1967. Many of its core issues remain unresolved and in the news. 

Politicians, diplomats, and journalists continue to grapple with the consequences of that war, but rarely provide context. Yet without context, some critically important things may not make sense. 

First, in June 1967, there was no state of Palestine. It didn't exist and never had. Its creation, proposed by the UN in 1947, was rejected by the Arab world because it also meant the establishment of a Jewish state alongside. 

Second, the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem were in Jordanian hands. Violating solemn agreements, Jordan denied Jews access to their holiest places in eastern Jerusalem. To make matters still worse, they desecrated and destroyed many of those sites. 

Meanwhile, the Gaza Strip was under Egyptian control, with harsh military rule imposed on local residents. 

And the Golan Heights, which were regularly used to shell Israeli communities far below, belonged to Syria. 

Third, the Arab world could have created a Palestinian state in the West Bank, eastern Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip any day of the week. They didn't. There wasn't even discussion about it. And Arab leaders, who today profess such attachment to eastern Jerusalem, rarely, if ever, visited. It was viewed as an Arab backwater. 

Fourth, the 1967 boundary at the time of the war, so much in the news these days, was nothing more than an armistice line dating back to 1949 — familiarly known as the Green Line. That's after five Arab armies attacked Israel in 1948 with the aim of destroying the embryonic Jewish state. They failed. Armistice lines were drawn, but they weren't formal borders. They couldn't be. The Arab world, even in defeat, refused to recognize Israel's very right to exist. 

Fifth, the PLO, which supported the war effort, was established in 1964, three years before the conflict erupted. That's important because it was created with the goal of obliterating Israel. Remember that in 1964 the only "settlements" were Israel itself. 

Sixth, in the weeks leading up to the Six-Day War, Egyptian and Syrian leaders repeatedly declared that war was coming and their objective was to wipe Israel off the map. There was no ambiguity. Twenty-two years after the Holocaust, another enemy spoke about the extermination of Jews. The record is well-documented. 

The record is equally well-documented that Israel, in the days leading up to the war, passed word to Jordan, via the UN and United States, urging Amman to stay out of any pending conflict. Jordan's King Hussein ignored the Israeli plea and tied his fate to Egypt and Syria. His forces were defeated by Israel, and he lost control of the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem. He later acknowledged that he had made a terrible error in entering the war. 

Seventh, Egypt's President Gamal Abdel Nasser demanded that UN peacekeeping forces in the area, in place for the previous decade to prevent conflict, be removed. Shamefully, without even the courtesy of consulting Israel, the UN complied. That left no buffer between Arab armies being mobilized and deployed and Israeli forces in a country one-fiftieth the size of Egypt -- and just nine miles wide at its narrowest point. 

Eighth, Egypt blocked Israeli shipping lanes in the Red Sea, Israel's only maritime access to trading routes with Asia and Africa. This step was understandably regarded as an act of war by Jerusalem. The United States spoke about joining with other countries to break the blockade, but, in the end, did not act. 

Ninth, France, which had been Israel's principal arms supplier, announced a ban on the sale of weapons on the eve of the June war. That left Israel in potentially grave danger if a war were to drag on and require the re-supply of arms. It was not until the next year that the U.S. stepped into the breach and sold vital weapons systems to Israel. 

And finally, after winning the war of self-defense, Israel hoped that its newly-acquired territories, seized from Egypt, Jordan, and Syria, would be the basis for a land-for-peace accord. Feelers were sent out. The formal response came on September 1, 1967, when the Arab Summit Conference famously declared in Khartoum: "No peace, no recognition, no negotiations" with Israel. 

Today, there are those who wish to rewrite history. 

They want the world to believe there was once a Palestinian state. There was not. 

They want the world to believe there were fixed borders between that state and Israel. There was only an armistice line between Israel and the Jordanian-controlled West Bank and eastern Jerusalem. 

They want the world to believe the 1967 war was a bellicose act by Israel. It was an act of self-defense in the face of blood-curdling threats to vanquish the Jewish state, not to mention the maritime blockade of the Straits of Tiran, the abrupt withdrawal of UN peacekeeping forces, and the redeployment of Egyptian and Syrian troops. All wars have consequences. This one was no exception. But the Arab aggressors have utterly failed to take responsibility for the actions they instigated. 

They want the world to believe post-1967 Israeli settlement-building is the key obstacle to Arab-Israeli peacemaking. The Six-Day War is proof positive that the core issue is, and always has been, whether the Arab world accepts the Jewish people's right to a state of their own. If so, all other contentious issues, however difficult, have possible solutions. But, alas, if not, all bets are off. 

And they want the world to believe the Arab world had nothing against Jews per se, only Israel, yet trampled with abandon on sites of sacred meaning to the Jewish people. 

In other words, when it comes to the Arab-Israeli conflict, dismissing the past as if it were a minor irritant at best, irrelevant at worst, won't work. 

Can history move forward? Absolutely. Israel's peace treaties with Egypt in 1979 and Jordan in 1994 prove the point. At the same time, though, the lessons of the Six-Day War illustrate just how tough and tortuous the path can be.

The foreign imported Hashemite monarchy sits on 80% of the mandate territory but does NOT allow the admission of Arab residents of the mandate into their JEW FREE heaven. the foreign stooges keep the pals out of Palestine. the removal of the stooges would remove the obstruction to the west bank former Jordanian citizens to move to the JEW FREE 80% portion of their homeland.
Its time for a new paradigm, it is not in Israel's interest either to prop up the monarchy that maintains the 80% JEW FREE, bars Jews from owning land and from citizenship. Remove protection from them, let them fall first, then go in after to mop it up and to open the border to the west bank pals.

The " imported Hashemite foreign monarchy"? So the monarchy is imported but the "Palestinian" people, invented by Arafat are legitimate? Even their own PLO admits they are just like other Arabs---"The Palestinian people [do] not exist... In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism." — PLO Executive Committee member Zahir Muhse'in, quoted in the Dutch newspaper Trouw. Maybe you would prefer the chaos of Syria or even as about to erupt in Gaza between Hamas and the "Omar Brigades" or maybe ISIS is more to your liking.

Abbas' family left voluntarily BEFORE the modern State of Israel was established. He is a citizen of Jordan, courtesy of Jordan's 1954 Citizenship Law, which bestowed Jordanian citizenship upon all Arabs in the West Bank and their progeny, irrevocably. An irrevocable grant of citizenship is precisely that -- IRREVOCABLE.

I don't think he can be stripped of his Jordanian citizenship -- Jordan's tried it with West Bank Arabs before, and the International Court of Justice in Den Haag always ruled it illegal. Abbas can call himself a "citizen" of "Palestine" but that begs the question -- what "Palestine," and where?

By the way, Safed -- Tsfat, in Hebrew -- is one of the oldest cities continually populated by Jews in the world. The Arabs are relative newcomers, and those that left voluntarily are not welcome back. Abbas' family, and many other Arab families in Israel, rejected Israel and voted with their feet. They thought they could come back after the Arabs had exterminated all the Jews in 1948. It didn't quite work out that way, and they cannot come back.

Palestine no longer exists. There are the sovereign states of Israel and the Kingdom of Jordan. There are Judea and Samaria, which are no sovereign and it is a foregone conclusion that they will be formally annexed by Israel. There is Gaza, which is a terrorist enclave populated by pseudo-"Palestinians." The pseudo-"Palestinians" in Judea and Samaria will not be permitted to remain there upon annexation. They are eligible to be repatriated to Jordan, country of their citizenship, but that would further destabilize an already unstable Jordan. Best bet all around is to expel them to Gaza, which is already populated by pseudo-"Palestinians." They can rename it whatever they like, but Gaza, a terrorist enclave, is a long way away from statehood. Perhaps the pseudo-"Palestinians" can make something work in Gaza. Very doubtful, but there is nothing wrong in giving them a shot and becoming something other than a lawless, non-sovereign entity. If they fail -- well, let's cross that bridge when we come to it.

They were forced out in 72 A.D. by the Roman Empire. When did your forebears decide to come to a country to which they had no right, title or claim and massacred over twenty million native Americans to take possession of a land which was never theirs to begin with?

Unlike me -- I am Jewish, therefore Israel is my ancestral homeland. That is historically and archaeologically indisputable. I did not steal anyone's home; I simply returned to mine. How about you? What land did your ancestors leave in order to steal someone else's, and when are you planning to return the land they stole to its rightful owners?